A systematic framework for detecting AI bias using real-world scenarios
instead of artificial academic tests
AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are being used for important decisions, but we don't really know how biased they are in real-world scenarios. Most existing tests use artificial questions that don't reflect how people actually use these systems.
We collected authentic news articles from around the world, covering:
Instead of artificial test questions, we used AI to generate natural questions people might actually ask about these news stories, like:
We fed the same article + question combinations to:
Here's the clever part: We had each AI system analyze not just its own responses, but all the other AI systems' responses for bias. This cross-checking reveals patterns that single evaluations miss.
Instead of just asking "is this biased?", we measured six different aspects:
All tested systems inject bias into their responses, even when analyzing politically neutral content.
Different companies' AI systems show distinct bias patterns:
AI systems that seem equally biased can have completely different cognitive abilities - crucial information that simple bias scores miss.
As AI systems make more decisions affecting people's lives, we need better ways to understand their biases and cognitive limitations. GENbAIs provides a framework for systematically evaluating AI systems using realistic scenarios rather than artificial tests.
Help organizations choose AI systems responsibly and push the industry toward more fair and reliable AI through systematic, verifiable bias detection methods.
Discover the complete findings, methodology, and tools from our systematic AI bias research
📊 View Full Research 📄 Read Research Paper 🧠 Expert Consulting